Gun Control And The Federal Government - 892 Words

For years gun control advocates pushed for a law passed by the federal government. For years this has not worked as the government has not wanted to touch the matter and have potential backlash. Although the federal government has not done much and does not seem to be doing anything any time soon, the states have huge potential to start the change. State governments can decide what laws can be passed and how serious their guns laws will and should be. Since the rise of mass shootings in schools and campus, states have been cracking down on guns and making stricter gun laws. After the Sandy Hook mass shooting in Connecticut, which left 20 children dead, the federal government failed to pass gun laws while states took their own actions and pass various laws. States like New York and Connecticut have been some of these states. There are already states that have passed that background checks are mandatory on all guns or handguns, and some of these states have made it mandatory for even unlicensed vendors and gun shows. This is a huge step for America as more states band together to impose stricter laws on firearms. In the past, states banding together to ban or legalize something has shown to influence the federal government or other states that have yet to follow. This has been proven with abortions and homosexual marriage and is now taking place with gun control. Gun control supporters have realized this and have started targeting t heir local governments to implement changeShow MoreRelatedShould the Federal Government Enforce Stricter Gun Control?619 Words   |  2 Pageswe are not doing enough to enforce the already existing laws and this is exactly what in all these many words I have been trying to put forward. Implementation is in many ways a political function. In, effort to reduce gun violence without stricter gun control, our federal government needs to take the responsibility in enforcing the current laws. The justice departments need to be proactive with prosecutions especially with cases of falsification of background information for example in 2009 FBI reportedRead MoreAmerican Federalism And Gun Control1364 Words   |  6 PagesAmerican Federalism and Gun Control In the Unites States of America Federalism is the basic structure of the American government; it is the distribution and balance of powers between the National government and the States government. In order to obtain a compromise between those who wanted stronger state government and those who preferred a stronger national government the founding fathers arranged and settled for a federal system rather than the alternatives of a unitary or confederal system.Read MoreGun Control Laws Should Have A Good Middle Balance1569 Words   |  7 PagesWhile some people say it takes away their rights , Gun control is a good thing because Less crimes will be committed by firearms, Gun control is good for everyone s safety , and Countries with stricter gun control has less death by firearms .America has the highest amount of gun related deaths each year in the world. â€Å"In Germany 381, in France 255, in Canada 165 in the United Kingdom 68, in Australia 65, in Japan 39 and in the United State s, 11,127† (Moore Michael, 51:15-51:48). Since the UnitedRead MoreThe Highest Amount Of Gun Control Laws1362 Words   |  6 PagesDanzo Research Paper America has the highest amount of gun related deaths each year in the world. â€Å"In Germany 381, in France 255, in Canada 165 in the United Kingdom 68, in Australia 65, in Japan 39 and in the United States, 11,127† (Moore Michael, 51:15-51:48). Since the United States has the highest number of deaths, it is important to have gun-control laws that restrict people from owning dangerous firearms like machine guns. Gun-control laws should support both sides of the debate. Of courseRead MoreGun Control Laws Should Have A Balance1439 Words   |  6 PagesAmerica has the highest amount of gun related deaths each year in the world. â€Å"In Germany 381, in France 255, in Canada 165 in the United Kingdom 68, in Australia 65, in Japan 39 and in the United States, 11,127† (Moore Michael, 51:15-51:48). Since the United States has the highest number of deaths, it is important to have gun-control laws that restrict people from owning dangerous firearms like machine guns. Gun-cont rol laws should support both sides of the debate. Of course, both sides will notRead MoreGun Control Vs. Federal Guns Control1336 Words   |  6 PagesSolis GOVT-2306 6015 Word count 1234 Texas gun control vs Federal gun control 8/13/2017 Third Party Gun Control The right to bear arms. Our second amendment right has been questioned by countless individuals on whether or not Texas has holds the write to regulate the possession of a firearms or federal government. There have been countless attempts by both state and federal government to regulate gun control. â€Å"In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court finallyRead MoreGun Control : A Part Of American Lifestyle Since Independence1369 Words   |  6 PagesGun culture is considered a part of American lifestyle since independence. People use and carry guns in everyday life for many purposes i.e. hunting, self-defense, sport etc. (Carter) On December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, a 20 years old boy Adam Lanza shot and killed 20 school children and 6 staff members at Sandy Hook Elementary School, after shooting his mother at his home. At arrival of police, he shot and killed himself too (Edition.cnn.com). This incident left whole of America inRead MoreThe Issue Of Gun Control Laws1701 Words   |  7 PagesA gun has the capacity to convert a conflict into a serious crime. The power of a gun is vast. But it the power of the gun is appreciated in right hands. The effects of a gun can be cherished when it is used by right hands and with the right intention. The effects of the gun are condemned when it reaches in wrong hands. A gun can protect as well as end someone’s life. When it ends the life of a criminal, it is a sign of bravery but when it takes the lives of innocent people it is condemned. ThereforeRead More The Issue of Gun Control Legislation Essay1597 Words   |  7 PagesThe Issue of Gun Control Le gislation One of the most controversial issues in our society is gun control legislation. Violence associated with guns is increasing every year and something must be done to stop it. Gun legislation varies in every state. In some states gun policy is stricter than in other states. Gun legislation should be abolished in favor of federal gun legislation. To analyze the problem with gun violence today you must understand the gun laws that are in effectRead MoreGun Control Laws Should Not The Safety Of The Citizens1681 Words   |  7 Pagesnumber one country for number of gun related deaths ratio each year. â€Å"In Germany 381, in France 255, in Canada 165 in the United Kingdom 68, in Australia 65, in Japan 39 and in the United States, 11,127† (Moore Michael, 51:15-51:48). Due to the United States having the greatest number of gun related deaths, it is almost essential to implement gun-control laws that restrict people from purchasing and owning dangerous firearms. The laws that are created to control the guns should ultimately keep the safety

Western Filipina Relationship Free Essays

Western-Filipina Relationship Denver Jane C. Diacor Why do lots of Filipino women choose foreigners as better husbands? How do Westerners differ from Filipino men? These are some of the typical questions asked by individuals since Western-Filipina relationship is now observed. And a number of Filipinas preferred husbands from the West in three main reasons: it might be for money, the feeling of acceptance, or for love. We will write a custom essay sample on Western Filipina Relationship or any similar topic only for you Order Now Money can be the first reason. It is quite absurd to see a 61 year-old man with a 25 year-old Filipina girlfriend, that’s why many people say that the girl is only looking after the money she could get from that old man. We cannot deny the fact that many wish to change their social status and get out from their life of being a poor, and marrying a foreigner is what they think the solution. However, in my own perspective, it is not really right to marry a person just because of money; others are just being practical. If money is seen as one of the reason in this relationship, the feeling of acceptance is another factor. Based on what I have read on some stories about this cross-cultural relationship, a Filipina said that she has a great feeling with her husband. She added that Western men are not really particular on how you dress or how you look as long as you are staying true to yourself. They will make you feel you are pretty and that you are special to them, unlike Filipino men who are judging you from the way you dress to the way you act. They are straightforward on telling your mistakes unlike Filipino men who are having that sugar-coated statement just to make sure you are not hurt. Thus, Western men will allow you to grow by telling what’s wrong and letting you check your weaknesses and shortcomings. Finally, for love, Westerners are more romantic and expressive in showing their affection. For me, traveling a distant place just to be with your love is quite very romantic. And two people living in an absolutely different world finding each other is true love. In short, the reason why some Filipina preferred foreigners as husband might be because of the money, because of the great feeling with the partner, or because of love. It is really great to find the right person you want to be with for the rest of your life. Either a Filipino or a Westerner, the first things we must consider in marriage or in a relationship is the love, acceptance, trust, loyalty, and understanding. How to cite Western Filipina Relationship, Papers

Attributive Appositive Clauses free essay sample

Only the unity of these three elements forms a language; without any one of them there is no human language in the above sense. The phonological system is the subfoundation of language; it determines the material (phonetical) appearance of its significative units. The lexical system is the whole set of naming means of language, that is, words and stable wordgroups. The grammatical system is the whole set of regularities determining the combination of naming means in the formation of utterances as the embodiment of thinking process. The grammatical description of language is effected by the science of grammar. In the following work you’ll be introduced to the main unit of speech-the sentence, and specifically to the attributive appositive clauses. I’ll illustrate them from the grammatical viewpoint. The term paper is composed of two chapters. The first chapter gives a minute introduction to the sentence, i. e. we’ll go through different definitions of a sentence stated by different linguists, will discuss the types of sentences according to their purpose of utterance and structure. We will write a custom essay sample on Attributive Appositive Clauses or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page We’ll learn that according to the structure simple and composite sentences are distinguished. Going further we’ll see that composite sentences, in their turn, are divided into more complex groups. In the second chapter attributive appositive clauses will be illustrated with their respective subgroups. And in the end you’ll be introduced to the conclusion of the term paper, the purpose of which is to combine and dispose all the information we have in the following work. So, let’s go ahead and begin reading from the first chapter. Chapter 1 1. General Overview of Sentence The notion of sentence has not so far received a satisfactory definition, which would enable us by applying it in every particular case to find out whether a certain linguistic unit is a sentence or not. There are different definitions of sentence given by linguists. Now I’ll introduce some of them in the following 3 paragraphs: According to Bloomfield a sentence is an â€Å"indepen dent linguistic form, not included by virtue of any grammatical construction in any larger linguistic form†. Kaushanskaya thinks that a sentence is a unit of speech whose grammatical structure conforms to the laws of the language and which serves as the chief means of conveying a thought (line 1, page 221, chapter 15, V. L. Kaushanskaya â€Å"Grammar of the English Language†, Moscow 2000). M. Y. Blokh states that a sentence is the immediate integral unit of speech built up of words according to a definite syntactic pattern and distinguished by a contextually relevant communicative purpose. Any coherent connection of words having an informative destination is effected within the framework of the sentence. Therefore the sentence is the main object of syntax as part of the grammatical theory (line 19, page 236, chapter 21, M. Y. Blokh â€Å"A Course In Theoretical English Grammar†, Moscow 1983). 1. 2 Classification of Sentences. The Classification of Sentences According to the Purpose of Utterance The classification of sentences is based on two factors: A) the purpose of utterance B) the structure According to the purpose of the utterance we distinguish between four kinds of sentences. 1) The declarative sentence. A declarative sentence states a fact in the affirmative or negative form. In a declarative sentence the subject precedes the predicate. It is generally pronounced with a falling intonation. Ex. George Gordon Byron was a British poet and a leading figure in the Romantic movement. I don’t know anything more dismal than that business. (Thackeray) 2) The interrogative sentence. An interrogative sentence asks a question. It is formed by means of inversion, i. e. by placing the predicate (or part of it) before the subject (unless the subject of the interrogative word, in which case there is no inversion. There are four kinds of questions: a) General question requiring the answer yes or no and spoken with a rising intonation. They are formed by placing part of the predicate, i. e. the auxiliary or modal verb before the subject of the sentence. Ex. What’s the matter now, my dear? (Thackeray) Can you walk now? (Thackeray) b) Special questions beginning with an interrogative word and spoken with a falling intonation. The order of words is the same as in general questions, but the interrogative word precedes the auxiliary verb. Ex. When are you coming back? Thackeray) c) Alternative questions, indication choice and spoken with a rising intonation in the first part and falling intonation In the second part. Ex. Is he coming tonight or tomorrow? (Thackeray) d) Disjunctive questions requiring the answer yes or no and consisting of an affirmative statement followed by a negative question, or a negative statement followed by an affirmative question. The first part is spoken with a falli ng intonation and the second part with a rising intonation. Ex. She is beautiful, isn’t she? (Thackeray) 3) The imperative sentence. An imperative sentence serves to induce a person to do something, so it expresses a command, a request, an invitation, etc. Commands are characterized by a falling tone. Ex. Leave the room immediately! (Thackeray) Requests and invitations are characterized by a rising intonation. Ex. Hand me that paper, please! (Thackeray) 4) The exclamatory sentence. An exclamatory sentence expresses some kind of emotion or feeling. It often begins with the words what and how, it is always in the declarative form, I. e. no inversion takes place. It is generally spoken with a falling intonation. Ex. Good Heavens Miss Sharp! Thackeray) Though In modern linguistics it has been demonstrated that exclamatory sentences do not possess the necessary qualities that could place them on one level with those mentioned above, but still, we do consider it as a type of a sentence according to the purpose of utterance. So, this principle of classification is also called â€Å"types of communication†. 1. 3 Th e Classification of Sentences According to the Structure Depending on their predicative complexity sentences can be monopredicative (one predicative line in them) and polypredicative (more than one predicative line). So, according to the structure we state two main types: simple sentences (one predicative line) and composite sentences (more than one predicative line). 1. 3. 1 The Simple Sentence A simple sentence is a sentence having only a subject, a predicate, and sometimes an object. According to their structure simple sentences are divided into two-member and one-member sentences. A two-member sentence has two principal members- a subject and a predicate. Ex. Fleur established immediate contact with an architect. (Galsworthy) This sentence has both a subject and a predicate. The subject is Fleur and the predicate is established. So, that’s why it is considered to be a two-member sentence. A two-member sentence may be complete or incomplete. It is complete when it has a subject and a predicate. Ex. He gave Harry a hearty wink. (Harry potter and the Chamber off secrets) In the above mentioned sentence he is the subject and gave is the predicate. So, the sentence is complete because it has both a subject and a predicate. A sentence is considered incomplete when one of the principal parts or both of them are missing, but can be easily understood from the context. Such sentences are called elliptical and are mostly used in colloquial speech and especially in dialogue. Ex. What were you doing? Drinking (Shaw) In the above mentioned sentence (â€Å"Drinking†) the subject is missing and the predicate is partially present, but from the context we can easily infer that the subject would be I, and the full sentence would look like this: I was drinking. A one-member sentence is a sentence having only one member which is neither the subject nor the predicate. This does not mean, however, that the other member is missing, for the one member makes the sense complete. One-member sentences are generally used in descriptions and in emotional speech. If the main part of a one-member sentence is expressed by a noun, the sentence is called nominal. The noun may be modified by attributes. Ex. Freedom! Bells ringing out, flowers, kisses, wine. (Heym) The main part of a one member sentence may often be expressed by an infinitive. Ex. To be or not to be! Simple sentences, both two-member and one-member, can be unextended and extended. A sentence consisting only of the primary or principal parts is called an unextended sentence. Ex. She is a student. Winter! An extended sentence is a sentence consisting of the subject, the predicate and one or more secondary parts (objects, attributes, or adverbial modifiers). Ex. The two native women stole furtive glances at Sarie. (Abrahams) 1. 3. 2 The Composite Sentence A composite sentence is a sentence that consists of two or more clauses. A clause is a part of a sentence which has a subject and a predicate of its own. There are two main types: independent (principal clauses), dependent (subordinate clauses). An independent (principal) clause is a complete sentence; it contains a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought in both context and meaning. Ex. The door opened. A dependent (subordinate) clause is part of a sentence; it contains a subject and verb but does not express a complete thought. Subordinate clauses can make sense on their own, but, they are dependent on the rest of the sentence for context and meaning. When these clauses join they form composite sentences. The composite sentence, as different from the simple sentence, is formed by two or more predicative lines. Being a polypredicative construction, it expresses a complicated act of thought, i. e. an act of mental activity which falls into two or more intellectual efforts closely combined with one another. In terms of situations and events this means that the composite sentence reflects two or more elementary situational events viewed as making up a unity; the constitutive connections of the events are expressed by the constitutive connections of the predicative lines of the sentence, i. . by the sentential polypredication. Each predicative unit in a composite sentence makes up a clause in it, so that a clause as part of a composite sentence corresponds to a separate sentence as part of a contextual sequence. Ex. When I sat down to dinner I looked for an opportunity to slip in casually the information that I had by accident run across the Driffields; but news travelled fast in Blackstab le. (S. Maugham) The cited composite sentence includes four clauses which are related to one another on different semantic grounds. The sentences underlying the clauses are the following: I sat down for dinner. I looked for an opportunity to slip in casually the information. I had by accident run across the Driffields. News travelled fast in Blackstable. The use of composite sentences, especially long and logically intricate ones, is characteristic of literary written speech rather than colloquial oral speech. This unquestionable fact is explained by three reasons: one relating to the actual needs of expression; one relating to the possibilities of production; and one relating to the onditions of perception. Composite sentences display two principal types of construction: subordination (hypotaxis) and coordination (parataxis). The initial rise of subordination and coordination as forms of composite sentences can be traced back to the early stages of language development, i. e. to the times when language had no writing. By coordination the clauses are arranged as units of syntactically equal rank, i. e. equipotent ly; by subordination, as units of unequal rank, one being categorically dominated by the other. In terms of the positional structure of the sentence it means that by subordination one of the clauses (subordinate) is placed in a notional position of the other (principal). The means of combining clauses into a polypredicative sentence are divided into syndetic, i. e. conjunctional, and asyndetic, i. e. non-conjunctional. Ex. He knew here were excuses for his father, yet he felt sick at heart. (Cronin) The month was July, the morning fine, the glass-door stood a jar, through it played a fresh breeze. (Ch. Bronte) Besides the classical types of coordination and subordination of clauses, we find another case of the construction of composite sentence, namely, when the connection between the clauses combined in a polypredicative unit is expressly loose, placing the sequential clause in a syntactically detached position. In this loosely connected composite, the sequential clause information is presented rather as an afterthought, an idea that has come to the mind of the speaker after the completion of the foregoing utterance, which later, by this new utterance-forming effort, is forcibly made into the clausal fore-part of a composite sentence. This kind of syntactic connection comes under the heading of cumulation. Its formal sign is often the tone of sentential completion followed by a shorter pause than an inter-sentential one, which intonational complex is represented in writing by a semi-final punctuation mark, such as semi-colon, a dash, sometimes a series of periods. Ex. He uttered no other words of greeting; there was too strong a rush of mutual consciousness. (Eliot) In the composite sentences the constitutive predicative lines are expressed separately and explicitly: composite sentences are formed by minimum two clauses each having a subject and a predicate of its own. Alongside of these â€Å"completely† composite sentences, there exist constructions in which one explicit predicative line is combined with another one, the latter being not explicitly or completely expressed. To such constructions belong, for instance, sentences with homogeneous predicates, as well as sentences with verbid complexes. Ex. Philip ignored the question and remained silent. These predicative constructions should be called semi-composite sentences. We divide composite sentences into compound and complex sentences.